NIS2 Directive · ISO/IEC 27001:2022
How well does your organisation meet NIS2?
69 requirements covering scope and registration, management-body accountability (Art. 20), the ten cybersecurity risk-management measures of Art. 21(2), incident reporting (Art. 23), information sharing, supervision and penalties, and the interplay with DORA, CER and the Cyber Resilience Act. Each requirement is mapped to the 93 Annex A controls and clauses 4-10 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022. You get compliance percentages, prioritised gaps, guidance and a PDF report. Usable by essential and important entities in any Member State; national transposition specifics are acknowledged but out of scope.
No data from this assessment is transmitted to GoToCertify.
How it works
- Profile: a few facts and yes/no questions exclude non-applicable requirements.
- Assessment: a 0-4 maturity level per requirement, with evidence and notes.
- Dashboard: compliance % by area, by source and by control group; P1/P2 gaps.
- PDF report: results, prioritised action plan with guidance, control map, roadmap.
69 requirements · 14 assessment areas · mapped to ISO 27001 · 60-120 minutes
Assessment areas
- SCO – Scope, registration and legal framework
Determine first whether the organisation is an essential or important entity (Annex I / Annex II sector, size-cap rule of Art. 2, designation by a Member State), in which Member State(s) it falls under jurisdiction (Art. 26) and which national transposition law applies. Register with the competent authority within the national deadline and keep registration data current; as of October 2026, 24 Member States have transposed NIS2; Ireland, Spain, France and the Netherlands were referred to the Court of Justice on 8 July 2026, and the Netherlands has since brought its law into force (15/08/2026). - GOV – Governance and management-body accountability
Art. 20 makes the management body personally accountable: it must approve the cybersecurity risk-management measures, oversee their implementation and follow regular training. Formalise this through board resolutions, a CISO or equivalent with direct reporting, a RACI covering all Art. 21 measures, and a documented management system that generates evidence for supervisors. - RSK – Risk analysis and security policies
Art. 21(2)(a) requires policies on risk analysis and information system security. Adopt an all-hazards risk management framework (Annex 2 of Implementing Reg. 2024/2690 is a good template for every entity), document risk assessments and treatment plans, and review them at least yearly and after significant incidents or major changes. - INC – Incident handling
Art. 21(2)(b): a documented incident handling process covering detection, logging and monitoring, event assessment and classification, response, evidence preservation and post-incident review. This process also feeds the Art. 23 reporting clock, so the significance criteria must be embedded in triage. - BCM – Business continuity, backup and crisis management
Art. 21(2)(c): business continuity and disaster recovery plans, backup management and crisis management. Define RTO/RPO per critical service, keep offline or immutable backups, test restores and run at least one crisis exercise per year involving the management body. - SCM – Supply chain security
Art. 21(2)(d): security of relationships with direct suppliers and service providers, taking into account their vulnerabilities, product quality and secure development practices, and the results of EU coordinated risk assessments (Art. 22). Maintain a supplier register with criticality, embed security clauses in contracts and monitor performance. - SDV – Secure acquisition, development and vulnerability handling
Art. 21(2)(e): security in acquisition, development and maintenance of network and information systems, including vulnerability handling and disclosure. Cover secure development life cycle, configuration and change management, patching, network security and a coordinated vulnerability disclosure (CVD) policy aligned with the national CVD framework (Art. 12) and the Cyber Resilience Act. - EFF – Assessing the effectiveness of measures
Art. 21(2)(f): policies and procedures to assess the effectiveness of cybersecurity risk-management measures. Define indicators, run internal audits, independent reviews and technical testing, and feed results into management review and continual improvement. - HYG – Cyber hygiene and training
Art. 21(2)(g): basic cyber hygiene practices and cybersecurity training for all staff. Implement a documented baseline (updates, hardened endpoints, least privilege, MFA, backups, phishing awareness, secure configuration) and a role-based training programme with records. - CRY – Cryptography and encryption
Art. 21(2)(h): policies and procedures regarding the use of cryptography and, where appropriate, encryption. Define approved algorithms and protocols, key management across the life cycle and a roadmap for post-quantum migration, which the January 2026 NIS2 amendment proposal would require Member States to address in national strategies. - HRA – Human resources, access control, assets and physical security
Art. 21(2)(i): human resources security, access control policies and asset management. Implementing Reg. 2024/2690 adds explicit expectations on physical and environmental security (Annex 13). Keep an asset inventory, classify information, manage the joiner-mover-leaver cycle, control privileged access and protect premises and equipment. - MFA – Multi-factor authentication and secure communications
Art. 21(2)(j): use of multi-factor or continuous authentication solutions, secured voice, video and text communications and secured emergency communication systems within the entity, where appropriate. Prioritise MFA for remote access, privileged accounts and cloud consoles, and provide out-of-band channels for crisis communication. - REP – Incident reporting and information sharing
Art. 23: significant incidents must be reported to the CSIRT or competent authority with an early warning within 24 hours, an incident notification within 72 hours, intermediate reports on request and a final report within one month; recipients of services must be informed. Entities under Implementing Reg. 2024/2690 apply its quantitative significance thresholds. Art. 29-30 encourage information sharing and voluntary notification. - SUP – Supervision, enforcement and interplay with other EU acts
Essential entities face ex ante supervision (Art. 32) and fines up to EUR 10 million or 2% of worldwide turnover; important entities ex post supervision (Art. 33) and fines up to EUR 7 million or 1.4%. Management bodies can be held liable and, for essential entities, temporarily banned (Art. 32(5)). DORA is lex specialis for financial entities (Art. 4), critical entities under CER are essential entities, and the Cyber Resilience Act adds product reporting duties from 11/09/2026.
Key regulatory dates
| Date | Source | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16/01/2023 | NIS2 | Entry into force of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 | In force |
| 17/10/2024 | NIS2 | Transposition deadline for Member States (Art. 41); Implementing Reg. (EU) 2024/2690 adopted | In force (24 Member States transposed as of 10/2026; IE, ES, FR, NL referred to CJEU 08/07/2026, NL transposed 15/08/2026) |
| 18/10/2024 | NIS2 | Application of national measures; NIS1 (Directive 2016/1148) repealed; Art. 20-23 obligations apply | In force |
| 07/11/2024 | Implementing Reg. 2024/2690 | Entry into force of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (technical and methodological requirements and significance criteria for digital infrastructure, ICT service management and digital providers) | In force |
| 17/01/2025 | NIS2 | Registration data of DNS, TLD, cloud, data centre, CDN, managed service providers, online marketplaces, search engines, social networks and domain registration services to the national authority for the ENISA registry (Art. 27(2)); DORA applies to financial entities | In force |
| 17/04/2025 | NIS2 | Member States establish the lists of essential and important entities (Art. 3(3)); review every two years | In force (national registration deadlines vary) |
| 26/06/2025 | ENISA | ENISA Technical Implementation Guidance v1.0 for Implementing Reg. 2024/2690 published (with mapping table to ISO/IEC 27001 and other standards) | Available |
| 20/01/2026 | Cybersecurity package (proposals) | Commission proposals for targeted NIS2 amendments (COM(2026) 13: small mid-cap category, scope clarifications, PQC in national strategies, harmonised ransomware data) and for a revised Cybersecurity Act; Digital Omnibus COM(2025) 837 proposed on 19/11/2025 | Proposal - not in force |
| 17/07/2026 | CER Directive | Deadline for Member States to identify critical entities under Directive (EU) 2022/2557 (Art. 6(1)); identified entities are essential entities under NIS2 | In force |
| 11/09/2026 | Cyber Resilience Act | Reporting obligations for manufacturers (actively exploited vulnerabilities and severe incidents) via the ENISA Single Reporting Platform | In force |
| 21/10/2026 | Digital Omnibus (proposal) | Council negotiating mandate on COM(2025) 837 (national incident-reporting entry points instead of a single EU portal; GDPR breach deadline 96 h); Parliament position pending; NIS2 targeted amendments COM(2026) 13 under negotiation | Proposal - not in force |
| 17/10/2027 | NIS2 | Commission review of the functioning of the Directive (Art. 40), then every 36 months; expected adoption window for NIS2 amendments | Future |
| 11/12/2027 | Cyber Resilience Act | Full application of CRA essential requirements for products with digital elements | Future |
Frequently asked questions
Is the NIS2 Directive self-assessment free?
Yes. The tool is free, requires no account and stores nothing on our servers: the assessment runs entirely in your browser and you download the PDF report and an optional save file to your computer.
Which standard is the NIS2 Directive assessment mapped to?
Every requirement is linked to the controls of ISO/IEC 27001:2022. The coverage map produced by the tool can be used as a basis for a Statement of Applicability.
How is the compliance percentage calculated?
Each applicable requirement is scored on a maturity scale from 0 (not started) to 4 (fully compliant). The compliance percentage is the ratio between the score obtained and the maximum obtainable. Priorities P1/P2/P3 combine criticality and maturity level.
Who is the assessment for?
Compliance, legal, IT security and risk functions of organisations established or operating in the EU; it is a self-assessment and does not constitute legal advice.
How up to date is the regulatory content?
The regulatory snapshot is dated 2026-10-31 (version 1.0). Proposals not yet adopted are labelled as such. References point to official sources (EUR-Lex, European authorities, ISO).
Other assessments
- EU AI Act – Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 as amended by the Digital Omnibus – mapped to ISO/IEC 42001:2023
- GDPR – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 with EDPB guidance – mapped to ISO/IEC 27701:2025
- DORA – Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 on digital operational resilience for the financial sector – mapped to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and ISO 22301:2019
- AI Act – Italia – AI Act, L. 132/2025, D.Lgs. 160/2026 e 179/2026 – mappato su ISO/IEC 42001:2023 (contenuti in italiano)
Self-assessment tool for information purposes only; it does not constitute legal advice. NIS2 is a directive: the applicable obligations, deadlines, registration procedures and penalties are those of the national transposition law of each Member State. References and dates must be verified against the official texts (EUR-Lex, national gazettes). No data from this assessment is transmitted to GoToCertify. © 2026 GoToCertify.